Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elsa Jacquemot vs Sofia Shapatava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jacquemot vs Shapatava analysis and find out who is favored!
Elsa Jacquemot vs Sofia Shapatava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jacquemot 0 - 0 Shapatava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jacquemot has won 41.35% of points on his second serve, while Shapatava has won 44.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jacquemot, in recent form, has won 55.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shapatava has won 55.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.32% and 43.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jacquemot has saved 53.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shapatava has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jacquemot has won 58.54% of matches played (W/L 48/ 34), with Shapatava winning 49.18% (W/L 30/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jacquemot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Shapatava has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 63/ 76).
- Player level: In the last year, Jacquemot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.32% of matches (W/L 38/ 25), where as Shapatava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jacquemot has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.39 while Shapatava has played against players with an average rank of 210.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jacquemot has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shapatava has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jacquemot has converted 45.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shapatava has converted 47.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jacquemot 0 - 0 Shapatava
150
Rank
143
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
539
Rank
186
High
35
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
53% (134-119)
Career Total W/L
49% (473-484)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
50% (19-19)
$273,923
Career Prize Money
$47,406
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elsa Jacquemot | Sofia Shapatava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 50% (19/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (38/32) | 51% (43/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (343/328) | 51% (424/413) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 52% (15/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 137 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 146 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:27 | 1:17:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 325.41 | 168.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1291/2149) | 63% (1235/1966) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (837/1291) | 58% (715/1235) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (365/858) | 44% (319/731) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (133/296) | 48% (129/269) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1038/2272) | 47% (959/2024) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 51% (19/18) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 51% (19/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 94% (18/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 6% (18/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 37% (19/7) | 10% (20/2) |
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Erika Andreeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
65%
(
97 of
150)
1st Serve %
54%
(
68 of
127)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
14
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
6 of
32)
45%
(
67 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
140
Total Points Won
137
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Olivia Gadecki
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
7
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Katarina Zavatska
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sofia Shapatava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sofia Shapatava
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Sofia Shapatava
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Oana Gavrila
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Sofia Shapatava
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Denisa Zoldakova
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Sofia Shapatava
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Gabriela Ce
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beatrice Ricci
Player
Sofia Shapatava
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Sara Cakarevic
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
72%
(
92 of
127)
1st Serve %
75%
(
99 of
132)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
55 of
99)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
65 of
132)
134
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacquemot Vs Shapatava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
